Protein Swap Comparison
Protein is the argument people reach for most often, so it is worth comparing sources on a like-for-like basis: emissions per 100 grams of protein delivered, not per kilogram of raw product. The figures below come from the Poore & Nemecek (2018) global meta-analysis covering roughly 38,700 farms in 119 countries.
Short answer: Per 100 g of protein, beef averages about 50 kg CO2-equivalent while tofu averages about 2 kg and pulses about 0.8 kg — a difference of roughly 25 to 60 times.
2595kg CO₂e
Beef (beef herd), per year
42kg CO₂e
Peas, beans & lentils, per year
2553kg saved
62.4× lower
| Source | kg CO₂e / 100 g protein | Relative |
|---|---|---|
| Beef (beef herd) | 49.9 | |
| Lamb & mutton | 19.9 | |
| Cheese | 10.8 | |
| Pork | 7.6 | |
| Farmed fish | 6.0 | |
| Poultry | 5.7 | |
| Eggs | 4.2 | |
| Milk | 3.2 | |
| Grains | 2.7 | |
| Tofu | 2.0 | |
| Peas, beans & lentils | 0.8 | |
| Nuts | 0.3 |
Global means · Poore & Nemecek 2018
How this is calculated
- Emissions are global mean values per 100 g of protein, cradle to retail, from Poore & Nemecek (2018).
- A serving is treated as 20 g of protein.
- Means hide wide production spreads; the best and worst producers of the same food can differ by an order of magnitude.
Frequently asked
- Which protein source has the lowest carbon footprint?
- Pulses — beans, lentils and peas — are the lowest at roughly 0.8 kg CO2-equivalent per 100 g of protein, followed by nuts and tofu.
- Is chicken a good climate choice?
- Chicken is far lower than beef or lamb, at about 5.7 kg CO2e per 100 g protein, but still several times higher than tofu or pulses, and it involves the most individual animals per kilogram.
- Do plant proteins provide all essential amino acids?
- Yes. A varied plant diet supplies all nine essential amino acids across the day; soy, quinoa and buckwheat each supply them in a single food.
Sources
More tools
Estimates, not personal measurements
Calculators use published averages and simplified assumptions. Results describe possible differences, not your precise footprint or an exact count of animals spared. Check each tool’s method, units and sources before comparing results.
Reference sources
